ToolScore

Continue

Continue Dev, Inc. · ai coding agents · Source: data snapshot · data as of 2026-09-16

The open-source IDE assistant layer — autocomplete, chat, and agents over any model you point it at.

77/100 Get it →
Real price
$0 · OSS
open-source
BYOK (own key)
Yes ✓
Any provider or local model (Ollama, LM Studio) for chat/agents; autocomplete works with free local models or
Limits
8.0/10
$0 OSS + local models = $0/mo · hosted models pay-per-token
Verdict
STRONG
None imposed by the tool — provider/local limits apply. Local-model autocomplete runs free forever on modest h

ToolScore breakdown — why 77/100

Price / Value
9.0
Token & Rate Limits
8.0
Speed / Latency
6.5
Privacy & Retention
9.0
BYOK (Own API Key)
10.0
Output Quality
6.5
Stability
6.0
Ease of Setup
7.5
Billing Transparency
9.0
Support & Community
5.5

10 criteria × 10 points. Low pillars are visible on purpose — that's the point of a score you can audit. Methodology →

✅ What it does well

  • Local-model route makes autocomplete + chat genuinely free, forever
  • Works in both VS Code and JetBrains — rare among OSS assistants
  • Config-as-code: assistant behavior is versioned YAML in the repo
  • No telemetry-by-default — a real privacy story

⚠️ Where it costs you

  • Peak quality depends entirely on the model you bring — ceiling is yours to buy
  • Autocomplete speed with local models lags hosted rivals on weak hardware
  • Extension updates have historically introduced regressions

Hidden traps — the stuff the pricing page doesn't say

low riskFree requires hardware honesty

The $0 path assumes a machine that can run a 7B-class model comfortably. On thin laptops, local autocomplete becomes a latency tax — budget for hosted tokens instead.

Try Continue

Know the limits before you pay: read the traps above, then decide with eyes open.

Visit official site →

Affiliate link where available — never affects the score.

⚠️ What the advertised price hides
Free core (Apache-2.0); a hosted hub adds team features. The open-source path is fully usable without it.
Sources & freshness

Data as of 2026-09-16. Prices and limits change monthly — report anything stale. How we verify: methodology.

Closest alternatives

Continue review

In-depth analysis · last updated 2026-09-16

The Swiss army knife, BYO blade

Continue is less a product and more a layer: autocomplete, chat/edit, and agent modes in VS Code and JetBrains, with every model decision left to you. Point it at Ollama and your monthly bill is zero; point it at a frontier API key and it behaves like a commercial assistant with your choice of brain.

The economics of free

The local route is the headline: tab-completion that costs nothing and never leaves your machine. The trade is honest — quality and speed become functions of your hardware (6.5/10 on both for the free path). For open-source work and non-sensitive side projects, it's unbeatable; for client work on a weak laptop, hosted tokens win.

Rough edges, versioned honestly

The IDE extension has a history of update-day regressions (stability 6/10), and support is community-tier (5.5/10). What you get in exchange is config-as-code: your assistant's rules, models, and context sources live in the repo, reviewable in PRs.

Verdict

77/100, Strong. The best fit for developers who want the assistant layer open, private, and cheap — and accept a self-managed ceiling.